首页> 外文OA文献 >The Effect of Preoperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis on Intraoperative Culture Results in Patients with a Suspected or Confirmed Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review
【2h】

The Effect of Preoperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis on Intraoperative Culture Results in Patients with a Suspected or Confirmed Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review

机译:疑似或确诊的人工关节感染患者术前抗菌药物预防对术中培养结果的影响:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Obtaining reliable cultures during revision arthroplasty is important to adequately diagnose and treat a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The influence of antimicrobial prophylaxis on culture results remains unclear. Since withholding prophylaxis increases the risk for surgical site infections, clarification on this topic is critical. A systematic review was performed with the following research question: in patients who undergo revision surgery of a prosthetic joint, does preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis affect the culture yield of intraoperative samples in comparison with nonpreoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis? Seven articles were included in the final analysis. In most studies, standard diagnostic culture techniques were used. In patients with a PJI, pooled analysis showed a culture yield of 88% (145/165) in the prophylaxis group versus 95% (344/362) in the nonprophylaxis group (P = 0.004). Subanalysis of patients with chronic PJIs showed positive cultures in 88% (78/89) versus 91% (52/57), respectively (P = 0.59). In patients with a suspected chronic infection, a maximum difference of 4% in culture yield between the prophylaxis and nonprophylaxis groups was observed. With the use of standard culture techniques, antimicrobial prophylaxis seems to affect cultures in a minority of patients. Along with the known risk of surgical site infections due to inadequate timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis, we discourage the postponement of prophylaxis until tissue samples are obtained in revision surgery. Future studies are necessary to conclude whether the small percentage of false-negative cultures after prophylaxis can be further reduced with the use of more-sensitive culture techniques, like sonication.
机译:在翻修术中获得可靠的培养物对于充分诊断和治疗假体关节感染(PJI)很重要。抗生素预防对培养结果的影响尚不清楚。由于不采取预防措施会增加手术部位感染的风险,因此对此主题进行澄清至关重要。对以下研究问题进行了系统评价:在接受假体关节翻修手术的患者中,与非术前抗菌预防措施相比,术前抗菌预防措施是否会影响术中样品的培养产量?最终分析包括七篇文章。在大多数研究中,使用标准的诊断培养技术。在患有PJI的患者中,汇总分析显示,预防组的培养产率为88%(145/165),而非预防组为95%(344/362)(P = 0.004)。慢性PJI患者的亚分析显示阳性培养率分别为88%(78/89)和91%(52/57)(P = 0.59)。在怀疑患有慢性感染的患者中,预防组和非预防组之间的培养物产量差异最大为4%。通过使用标准的培养技术,抗菌药物的预防似乎会影响少数患者的培养。除了已知的因抗菌药物预防时机不足而导致的手术部位感染的风险外,我们不鼓励将预防措施推迟到在翻修手术中获得组织样本之前。有必要进行进一步的研究,以得出结论,是否可以通过使用更加敏感的培养技术(如超声处理)来进一步减少预防后假阴性培养的小百分比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号